No Denying It: Get Your
Medicare Claims Paid the First Time
By
Joe McTernan
Are you continually frustrated by claim denials from Medicare? Do you
sometimes think your carrier is denying your claims without even
looking at them? These are complaints AOPA members voice on a regular
basis.
While Medicare is not always a model of claims processing perfection,
many claim denials are the result of errors made by the provider
submitting the claim. Taking the extra time to make sure that your
claim is complete and accurate may prevent unnecessary claim denials
and the increased account receivable balances that accompany them.
Automatic pay or deny
Medicare does in fact deny many claims before they are ever seen by an
actual person. The sheer volume of DMEPOS claims received by a
DMERC/DMAC on a daily basis dictates the need for some form of
automation that verifies a claim is complete and eligible for
reimbursement before it gets passed down the line for processing.
This first level of processing is called the “common working
file” and verifies that the patient was eligible for Medicare
benefits on the date of service. Once this is verified, the claim
continues through various levels of automated processing, and depending
on the systems in use, may complete processing and be paid or denied
without ever being reviewed by a person.
There are several things you can do to make sure you are submitting
appropriate information to the correct payer when submitting your
claims. While it is impossible to cover every potential pitfall, the
following are some things to double-check before you submit a Medicare
claim.
File to the correct carrier
One of the most avoidable claim mistakes occurs when a claim is filed
to the wrong carrier. This occurs primarily in states that are located
on the border between DMERC/DMAC regions or in states with large
populations of “snowbirds” who have two residences.
The correct jurisdiction for DMEPOS claims is determined by the
location of the patient’s primary residence rather than the
location where the service was provided.
For example, if your practice is in Florida and you provide an orthosis
to a patient who lives in New York but spends the winter months in
Florida, the claim should be filed to the Region A DMERC/DMAC, not the
Region C DMERC/DMAC. Filing your claim to Region C would result in a
denial stating that the service should be submitted to another carrier
for consideration.
This error can be avoided by verifying the patient’s permanent
address during intake and filing the claim to the correct regional
carrier.
DMERC or DMAC—What's the Difference? Durable Medical Equipment Regional Carriers (DMERCs) were established in the early 1990s to process Medicare claims for all Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics and Supplies (DMEPOS) in a particular region. In addition to processing claims, each DMERC also handled medical review and medical policy development for its individual region. The Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 required CMS to separate claims processing responsibilities from medical review and policy responsibility. This led to the replacement of DMERCs with Durable Medicare Administrative Contractors (DMACs), responsible for claims processing, and Program Safeguard Contractors (PSCs), responsible for medical review and policy development. The PSCs were established as of March 1, 2006 and the DMACs were scheduled to transition on July 1, 2006. This transition has taken place in DMERC Regions A and B, but has been delayed until October 1st for DMERC Regions C and D due to a protest filed by CIGNA Medicare, the former Region D DMERC contractor. Once this protest is resolved, the DMERCs will be replaced by a DMAC and a PSC for each of the four regions. |
Don’t resubmit unnecessarily
It can be very frustrating to submit a claim and then wait
several weeks for payment. This frustration often leads to practices
submitting another claim for the same service. While this may appear to
be a thorough follow-up procedure, it can lead to claim denials.
The second claim will most likely be identified as a duplicate claim,
resulting in an automatic denial. This does not do anything to speed
the processing of the initial claim and can often lead to confusion and
further delay.
In addition, if you routinely file duplicate claims, Medicare may see this as abusive or even fraudulent claims activity.
Rather than submitting duplicate claims, take the time to call the
DMERC/DMAC and speak to the customer service staff or go online to the
carrier’s Web site and find out about the status of the initial
claim.
If the claim is being held up for a reason, you may be able to provide
them with additional information that will allow the claim to be
processed, along with your payment.
Modifiers are important
HCPCS codes are used to tell Medicare what you did. Modifiers can tell
Medicare why, where and how many items you provided. Missing modifiers
often lead to claim denials, because the DMERC/DMAC simply does not
have enough information to determine whether you should be reimbursed.
Modifiers can be used to confirm any number of facts, such as to show
you have appropriate medical necessity information on file (KX), to
document a patient’s functional level (K1-K4)—which then
determines the type of prosthetic components Medicare will
cover—or to identify what side of the body the device is for (LT,
RT, LTRT).
As important as it is to know when to include a modifier, it is equally
as important to know when not to include one. For example, when
providing a single therapeutic shoe, you must include an LT or RT
modifier to indicate to which foot the shoe is being fit.
When providing a pair of therapeutic shoes, however, Medicare policy
states that the LTRT modifier should not be used. Instead, indicate the
number of services as two. Including an LTRT modifier in this situation
may actually cause claim delay or denial rather than assist in claim
processing.
When patients should pay
In addition to preventing denials, you want to make sure that
any denials you do receive will allow you, when appropriate, to bill
the patient for the denied device.
Medicare rules protect patients from responsibility if the service you
provided is deemed not medically necessary. This means that if you
submit a claim for a service and Medicare denies it as not medically
necessary, you may not charge the patient for the service.
There is an important exception to this provision. You are allowed to
hold the patient responsible if you notify them in writing prior to
delivering the service that you have a specific reason why you believe
Medicare will deem the service not medically necessary. This allows the
patient to make an informed decision on whether or not to receive the
service.
If, after reading and signing the appropriate form, the patient elects
to receive the service and Medicare denies the claim as not medically
necessary, the patient may be held responsible for your charges.
CMS has published a form specifically for this purpose called an
Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN). You can download the form at www.cms.hhs.gov/BNI/Downloads/
CMSR131G.pdf.
Claims where an ABN is on file must be billed with a GA modifier in
order for Medicare to indicate that the patient remains responsible for
payment if the claim is denied as not medically necessary. Without a GA
modifier, the claim will be denied with no patient responsibility
indicated on the Medicare Summary Notice.
| AOPA offers regular documentation seminars that outline critical documentation requirements, give attendees hands-on practice writing good supporting documentation for O&P claims, and explain how to prevent legal infringement due to poor documentation. For more information, or to register for AOPA’s final documentation seminar of the year (held on Nov. 17 in San Antonio, Texas), visit www.AOPAnet.org or contact Heather Franklin at hfranklin@AOPAnet.org or (571) 431-0876, ext. 205. |